Lagrangian Dynamics
Table of Contents
Notation
position vector of particle of mass
is velocity
is linear momentum
is kinetic energy
is the unit vector perpendicular to
(the unit position vector)
Stuff
Equations / Theorems
Galilean Transformation
Transforms from one inertial frame to another moving at constant velocity relative to it

Then,


Conservation laws
Linear momentum
Angular momentum

Proof

Remember, in this case we have and thus $×
Lagrange's equations
Equations of motion in terms of generalised coordinates.

- equivalent to Newton's laws
- constraint equation have been eliminated
- constraint forces do not appear - they don't contribute to
Remember that the generalized forces are simply the forces projected onto the generalized coordinates
.
Derivation
We restrict our attention to functions of the form , where
denotes the generalised coordinates.
We assume Newton's Laws to be true in this derivation.
Since we can apply the "cancellation of dots" which just says that for the case where
is not a function of
, then we have

thus,


Further,
![\begin{equation*}
\begin{align}
\frac{d}{dt} \Bigg[ \frac{\partial}{\partial \dot{q}_j} \Big(\frac{1}{2} m_i \dot{x}_i^2 \Big) \Bigg] &=
\frac{d}{dt} \big( m_i \dot{x}_i \big) \frac{\partial x_i}{\partial q_j} + m_i \dot{x}_i \frac{d}{dt} \Big( \frac{\partial x_i}{\partial q_j} \Big) \\
&= m_i \ddot{x}_i \frac{\partial x_i}{\partial q_j} + m_i \dot{x}_i \frac{\partial}{\partial q_j} \dot{x}_i \\
&= F_i \frac{\partial x_i}{\partial q_j} + \frac{\partial}{\partial q_j} \Big( \frac{1}{2} m_i \dot{x}_i^2 \Big) \quad & \text{by Newtons 2nd law}
\end{align}
\end{equation*}](../../assets/latex/lagrangian_dynamics_a0da3a3cb9c1ec46255e5eea377703e4e3d653e0.png)
Summing over
![\begin{equation*}
\frac{d}{dt} \Bigg[ \frac{\partial}{\partial \dot{q}_j} \Big( \sum_i \frac{1}{2} m_i \dot{x}_i^2 \Big) \Bigg]
\end{equation*}](../../assets/latex/lagrangian_dynamics_cf5376d9a657651bf7ef9bba0aece0889045511b.png)
we see that it's just the kinetic energy as a function of the generalised coordinates, velocities and time.
Thus,
![\begin{equation*}
\frac{d}{dt} \Bigg[ \frac{\partial}{\partial \dot{q}_j} \Big( \sum_i \frac{1}{2} m_i \dot{x}_i^2 \Big) \Bigg]
= \sum_i F_i \frac{\partial x_i}{\partial q_j} + \frac{\partial}{\partial q_j} \Big( \sum_i \frac{1}{2} m_i \dot{x}_i^2 \Big)
\end{equation*}](../../assets/latex/lagrangian_dynamics_6aba3617efaede628a055a04246aea0d6a3a578e.png)
where the first term is just .
Since the constraint forces do now work, the sum over all constraint forces is zero.
Therefore we end up with Lagrange Equations

Using conservative forces
If the forces are conservative there exists a potential energy function such that

Assume $V = V(\{qj\}, t) then

Since , we may write

where
This is for holonomic constraints.
This applies to systems which also does not conserve their energy, unlike the usual

which is only valid for systems which conserve energy.
Definitions
Intertial frame
A frame in which Newtons 1st and 2nd laws hold.
Newtons Laws
Newtons 3rd law
Weak

for two objects and
acting on each other.
Strong
Weak assumption AND acts along
Effect potential

due to

where gives us

Constraint force
Constraint forces do no work in any small instantaneous displacement of the system consistent with the constraints themselves.
Does not mea that the constraint forces can do no work during the actual motion of the system, e.g. a particle constrained to lie on a surface which is itself moving: there may then be a component of the actual particle velocity in the direction of the constraint force, so that work is done.
Circular orbits


Holonomic constraints
Example

i.e. it's a algebraic equation between the coordinates, not a differentiable relation and not an inequality.
Generalised coordinates
Consider a system with coordinates, i.e. 3D with
particles each with coordinates, and let these coordinates be denoted by $xi,$ where
.
That is, we're just "flattening" the matrix to a
vector.
If holonomic constraints, not all
are independent, and
set of independent variables

We might have dependence between the due to the constraints being imposed, and thus representing the coordinates in the above way is just "removing" the dependence between the
.
Hence, we end up with a basis of dimensions.
Our aim is to derive 2nd order differential eq. for the set of generalised coordinates
.
Transformation from to
is invertible using constraint eq., that is:

cannot be varied independently without violating the constraints, whereas we can vary
while still satisfying the constraints.
Generalised velocities
If denotes the generalised coordinates, then
represents the generalised velocities.
Generalised forces

Here may have a component in the direction of a constraint force, due to motion, and so the constraint force may do work, e.q. a body on a surface is utself moving.
"Instantaneous", i.e.
Then a small change consistent with constraints

In a virtual displacement the work done is

since constraint forces do no work.

where
